marion

Marion Posch

Marion Posch, nella sua carriera agonistica ha conquistato 2 titoli di Campionessa del Mondo, 2 Coppe del Mondo assolute, 16 vittorie in Coppa del Mondo, 43 podi in Coppa del Mondo e segue »

Final Runs at SnowWorld Landgraaf, Holland - Meinhard Erlacher (ITA)

Meinhard Erlacher

Residente a San Virgilio di Marebbe, Erlacher è uno specialista dello slalom e dello gigante. Ha esordito nella Coppa del Mondo di snowboard il 17 gennaio 2001 nel gigante parallelo di Plan de Corones giungendo 40°. Nel 2002 ha conquista la medaglia di segue »

lidiatrettel

Lidia Trettel Argento GS Mondiali ’99

Lidia Trettel (Cavalese, 5 aprile 1973) è una snowboarder italiana. È stata la prima donna italiana a vincere una medaglia olimpica in questo sport.Debuttò nella Coppa del Mondo di snowboard nella stagione 1995/96. segue »

Deeluxe stays true to the hardbooter July 10th, 2004 Billy Bordy

Deeluxe stays true to the hardbooter, bringing some cosmetic upgrades into the tried and true Speed line. A quick glance at next year’s action shows the same line-up coming out of the Deeluxe camp as last year. The Indy (AF-700) is the flagship, full race boot providing the experienced carver with the ride they expect from Deeluxe. The Suzuka (AF-600) keeps the lighter racer or recreational carver in the trench with a bit softer flex and feel. Deeluxe also keeps its Raichle inspired roots with the Le Mans; which is a performance freecarve boot based on Raichle’s first series, the SB, dating back to the late eighties. Deeluxe is still looking to the future, with their entire line remaining Intec compatable. The trick, semi-moldable Thermo Fit bladders remain the stock option for those with a Deeluxe friendly foot shape. The Speed Thermo full customization light weight liner is, of course, available as an option for the entire line.
Deeluxe has provided hardbooters with a snowboard specific product for so long that almost every seasoned rider has, or has had, a set in their quiver. The renaming of the hardboot line from Raichle to the softboot banner Deeluxe may have come to improve sales as Raichle’s own softboot line surpassed the hardboots in sales. In a heroic attempt to maintain the line, Raichle’s name has gone to the wayside in favor of the hip Deeluxe image. The name change’s only effect was some small confusion to the intimate and growing hardboot community, accustomed to searching the Internet for the key word, Raichle.
Deeluxe again provides a product for every rider next year. The Indy gets a faster race car red paint job with a matching tongue and spoiler, completing the exterior. The remainder of the boot looks unchanged, featuring the Indy specific, Power Flex Asym shell providing the stiffest ride of the line. The forward lean continues to be controlled by the questionable spring-load forward lean mechanism. While the mechanism works well for the majority of the carvers the boot is designed for, heavy and powerful expert trenchers may find the weak upper junction of the shaft and upper cuff pin are prone to bending, and although very rare, possible failure. The solution is a switch to the 5-step forward lean mechanism, providing a stiffer and often more desirable ride for the hard core rider. Unfortunately, removing the damper ride of the spring can also have a negative impact to some. Unless Deeluxe offers a replacement kit with a better junction and cuff pin system, the benefits of the spring-load forward lean will involve a pre and post ride check for bending, and replacement when needed to avoid failure. This comes at the cost of the consumer, who must hammer out the pin to check it, which may possibly elongate the pin hole with repeated removal and reassembly. Indy riders will still receive the stock Full fit liner with thermo zones in key comfort and hold down areas, providing a slightly stiffer ride and semi-adjustable fit. The bladder uses the same powerstrap design as last year’s boot, providing a firmer bladder-to-tongue interface than the Le Mans boot, but still lacking the clamping power of a full wrap strap. Deeluxe believes the current design provides ample power while reducing the amount of shin bang in the stock liner. This will probably be the most modified part of the boot thanks to the Booster Strap, however, if you choose the full customization Speed Thermo liner it may be your only option due to the lack of any power strap.
The Suzuka again shares the same overlap tongue shape and shell with the Indy, providing a slightly more flexible boot with lots of free-carving and racing potential and has found its way onto 2002 silver medalist Richard Richardson’s feet. This is a full- blown carver’s boot with a softer Carve Flex Asym shell, more durable, but fixed 5-step forward lean mechanism. Only 3 of the positions are truly usable, and the coarseness of the positioning determining your forward lean forcing you to look to canting to offset the fact you would like to be between positions 2 and 3. The Semi- Fit, semi moldable liner, provides just a little less support than the Full Fit semi-moldable liner. The reduction in moldable zones separates the Suzuka from its bastard, hardcore cousin, the Indy. It also will change colors into a pleasing navy with black tongue and spoiler highlights. This boot rips all by itself and is on par with many Race Boots from other manufacturers, allowing it to be the recreational carvers’ boot of choice in 2005.
The Le Mans maintains its roots by allowing an economical option for the hardboot enthusiast who enjoys a softer flexing supportive boot to ride all conditions all the time. While it maintains the soft flexing outdated Flexon Comp tongue design it remains a favorite to some. Attempting to stay true to the fit and performance of a full tongue boot, Deeluxe has maintained the Le Mans nicely. It features the Ride Flex Asym shell, 5-step forward lean mechanism, and Core Fit non-moldable liner. This boot surely fills a niche but has all the weaknesses that the SB line had when the AF line went into production. The cant adjuster is still weak and prone to breakage even though it went through a semi successful although not bombproof upgrade in the AF series. The lack of a usable power strap and poor drive through the diagonal plane are still the boot’s major flaws.
Perhaps a better marketing campaign would be to drop the aging, substandard Le Mans and refine the flaws in the Indy and Suzuka which would provide Deeluxe with a firm foundation to continue their contribution to the hard boot community. Deeluxe continues to make an outstanding product next year; with very few contributors to the market, it is hard to find flaw in any hard boot that is snowboard specific. Deeluxe continues to be the hard boot of choice for most riders because of their commitment to the sport, and their long lasting history of quality and performance. Next year’s line offers all of the same thrills as last year’s line. The only noticeable upgrades being a flashy new paint job, leaving many riders in the same boot for the 3rd or 4th season fulfilled or perhaps looking to E-Bay closeouts for a deal on last years colors at a fraction of the price.’
–Billy Bordy

  July 10th, 2004 Billy Bordy

Condividi !!
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Swoard for some turns September 3rd, 2004 Billy Bordy


Some boards are built to fill a niche; soft boot boards really have several categories: pipe, park, rail, pow, big mtn., bx, and the self proclaimed “freeride” do it all stick. Each style of board provides a very unique ride with even the sloppiest soft set up providing the input. While the soft boot market is currently large enough to support several shapes and flexes, the Swoard may be the first board to enter a Hard Boot market here in the U.S. and fill a possible East Coast niche. Hopefully the Hard boot world is ready for an EC board. The more alpine product out there the better!
Hardbooter had no plans to review the Swoard at all this year. To be honest, the shape seems more like a step backwards to the days of long slow edge changes on silly fat boards. This board may need to hit the Gym to drop a few centimeters at the waist-line.
 
When boards vary in length, width and symmetry, riders mirror the range of shapes and dimensions with their own array of styles. That is what I found the Swoard is all about; a different style. The EC guys claim that the board brings out an all new, all improved style. After chatting with several riders who were new to the sport and had been amazed by the EC web site and sold on the fact that this was the only way to ride alpine, and all that “skinny crap” I had been riding for years was, well, all wrong, I jumped at the chance to ride a Swoard.

I met a guy named John-Paul at Park City Mtn. Resort at the end of the season. As we exchanged introductions in the lift line, I learned that he was from Chile and was visiting Park City on business. As the introductions passed and we got to talking about Hardbooting, I found out that he did some South American distribution work for Catek and Swoard on the side. John-Paul was stoked on the Swoard and Jeff Caron’s product, and after verifying we were both in the same shell size, I hit him up for some Swoard time. He was quick to accept and, perhaps, just as excited to try out the stick I was on.

After some (allen) wrenching I had the Swoard 175 with hard flex pattern ready to ride and we were headed for the top on the Silverload chair. The first turns happened on a mellow pitch leading to some steeps and I felt like I was learning how to ride my Checker Pig G6 all over again! After a few more turns I even felt some-what like a younger man on a Rossi GS board in the early 90′s with huge edge angles and without any drag. Images of Shannon Mellhuse laid out on the snow half carving, half controlled sliding flashed before me; a very EC style turn but a decade before its creation? As I aggressively charged on to a steeper pitch and opened the throttle up a little more, another vision appeared of Cliff and the Buttermilk crew riding softly on wide boards in Ride the Edge. (I always wondered why they did not charge at all? They rolled on edge and laid and dragged then flopped to the other edge, much unlike the railed New England style I knew so well) I mimicked the smooth layout style I had mastered watching the video over and over and it almost felt as though I was rediscovering a long lost turn. The Swoard started the turn very nicely each time and at slow speeds. (under 15mph) It held a nice clean line, almost diving into the snow and begging me to lean until the snow impeded my angle. Crossing the fall line I rolled onto the other edge. The transition seemed to hang for just a moment and then smoothly began a new turn that then seemed to tighten a bit more quickly then the last. Now as the pitch began to force me to accelerate I really tried to stand on the board, ripping across the fall line slightly up hill to dump speed and maintain control. I dragged my body inside of each turn I lay out as much as possible between the edge changes, with the moist late season Utah snow sticking to me as it sprays everywhere but holding up very well under the big fat platform of the Swoard. For just a moment a smile creeps onto my face as I imagine the Swoard trenching through some wide-open, European face, railing laid out turns on and off the cord. It all makes sense! I understand the boards niche and it’s only my first run on the thing. I drag out a toeside edge to really build some speed and see what type of edge hold the Swoard really has. As my speed creeps up into the upper 20s, everything changes. The once solid platform now begins to bounce and chatter! I fight for edge hold and balance as I rip the middle of the turn. The tail folds just behind the back foot, not much at first but just a little as I exit the heelside. I throw my self over the board and allow the board to pass under to try and minimize the force onto the nose after feeling the board fail at the exit of the last turn. The nose begins to hook up but I cannot hold a railed turn at this speed. I reach out and through the apex of the turn trying to salvage what’s left of the bounce and chatter to still maintain control. I almost felt as though I made the turn wrong. Maybe it’s my fault the board is having such a hard time keeping up because it failed so soon and at such a slow speed. I spot some fresh cord off to the side and head for it hoping that my heelside will hold up on the yummy spring snow. After allowing the time for a solid EC turn initiation, I commit to the heelside and am only faintly rewarded for my input with a bouncy nose. This redirects me slightly before the board folds (arrows) between my feet and slides out 4 to 6 meters before I regain control. I try 10 more turns with proper EC style and receive little help from the board. I revert back to my racer roots and go into fight mode struggling to regain control. I dump speed and try to maintain turn shape and control the entire pitch. Magically and around the same speed that it all fell apart, it comes back together. I’m back to the photo quality EC turn and the Swoard feels like a snowboard again only giving me a bounce or bump when I try and push it too hard reminding me to back off the throttle and stay slow and low. As I work the Swoard through the end of the run I really got a chance to feel the board and its purpose much like the beginning of the run were I could see the niche it fills.

The rest of the time I spent on the Swoard was not as satisfying as that first run, perhaps because the board failed at the same speeds that some freeride softboot boards can handle. Possibly I was disappointed by the ride because I have ridden better stock boards from almost every major manufacture than this “Extreme Carver” from Swoard, over the years at less cost regardless of shape. I would love to see a shape similar to the Swoard show up in a more stable product.
 
Although anyone riding before the days of the four hole pattern may not see anything revolutionary in the shape or ride of the Swoard, the guys at Extremecarving.com have done a great job at marketing a old shape with a new attitude. They have clear and simple ordering guidelines for any one wishing to purchase a Swoard direct from them. They do still use a height guideline for size selection, a process considered out dated by most manufactures. Swoard does take into account rider weight, foot size and ability, to match rider and board. Unfortunately at this time Swoard has lost the factory making their product and is shopping around for a new facility. With so many Swoard fans it will hopefully only be a matter of time before they are pumping out product again.

The Swoard product has all the versatility necessary to provide entry-level riders with a tool that carves a very clean line. Unfortunately the board fails at speeds well below that of a true “race” board. The wide width of the board has several benefits. It allows the rider to run less angle and provides better float in crud and variable conditions allowing the board to be more stable at slower speeds. However, other boards provide the same rider angle options by simply incorporating lift on a more narrow board. The Swoard might be in your quill as a specialty board if you’re not willing to ride softies but still want to ride the crud and pow and have a bit of money to burn. But if you are rider who prefers speed on groomers, this board will spend more time in your quiver than on the snow. Test one out if you can but I have found that the Ride Timless, Salomon E.R.A., Burton Custom X or T6, Nitro Darkhorse or Natural all held an edge as well or better then the Swoard with Cateks on them.

–Billy Bordy

September 3rd, 2004

http://hardbooter.net/blog/

Condividi !!
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Virus Review May 18th, 2008 Billy Bordy

Virus Review

Virus Phantom IV

Virus Phantom IV

It is not news that we at Hardbooter love metal boards. We stock almost every North American metal board made so it’s time to look abroad. We love the ubersticks, and Virus is as uber as it gets; made in Germany, a country with a love for hardboot snowboarding. Virus’s handmade alpine snowboard program started over 20 years ago and in that time they have mastered the alpine snowboard.

If you are considering a Virus, you are joining a club, like owning a Lambo or playing polo and there will be a cost to consider. If you are ready to make the investment for enjoyment, then here’s some insider’s info.

Virus Phantom IV

Virus Phantom IV

First off, the quality of anything that says Virus on it is industry leading. Frank Deitzel comes across as a free spirited smiling guy every time you see him but there might be a bit of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde syndrome going on because when he starts building a board he turns into the most anal builder on the planet. Everything about the Virus product is built to the highest standard – something almost impossible to achieve if you’re a mere mortal.

Since the quality of the product alone is enough to justify the cost, then the selection and options provided by Virus on each new board should just be perks. Buying a Virus snowboard is like purchasing a fine auto with personal options to define ones’ style.

Virus Phantom IV

Virus Phantom IV

Decide on a model, create your own shape, pick your preferred construction materials or perhaps even combine a few. If you like the feel of a metal board but like more pop Virus can do it. Want a super narrow wood board with some zylon? Sure thing, no problem. Have a “great” idea for a shape and construction you think doesn’t exist; chances are Virus has are ready built the board you have in mind. In fact, Virus has been the go to builder for several other companies’ products. Many of the boards out of the Virus factory receive huge accolades in the alpine community without the riders even knowing they are aboard a Virus snowboard.

Frank has been building boards for over twenty years and has compiled a huge amount of templates for shapes. It may be that this level of diversity has brought Frank to true snowboard building zen; mastering all conditions and styles.

Virus may be one of the only companies to please all of the people all of the time. They may have the most diversified line up in alpine snowboarding. Their boards range from pure high energy PGS and PSL race shapes for the high end athlete to the easy to ride cruising shapes for the alpine connoisseur to some of the most versatile powder boards to ever carve a clean line in the cord between stashes.

Virus Scalpell

Virus Scalpell

The Phantom IV and the Scalpel 180 came home with us after the SES in February and we have been putting them through the wringer since we got them. Read on for the Hardbooter Review.

First off, as I mentioned, the construction of each board is un-matched. As with all the Virus line it’s almost heartbreaking to even ride on one of these things because they are so damn pretty. But looking at a snowboard only excites me so much. So screw em’ literally. I, as always, screwed the Phantom IV with some trusty F2 race plates and poly riser plates to keep the race feel alive. I rode it with UPZ Virus edition boots, Deeluxe 700′s and the Head Straus Pro’s. The Scalpel found itself sporting poly plates with both the old F2′s and some Bomber TD2s with yellow pads and a suspension kit.

Lets cover the Phantom IV. Frank brought this board over to SES just for us after chatting on the phone off and on for over a year. We were pleased that Frank had made this board just for us. We had logged a ton of sessions on the Phantom III in and out of race courses and back to back with Kessler and Prior metal boards. We had already developed a great feel for the III and where very excited to see what the IV had to offer. I wasted no time putting the first session in at SES over at Highlands. I had the III wired and was ready to unload on the IV.

Virus Phantom IV

Virus Phantom IV

Dave and I dropped in on some nice pitch with great AM cord and I threw the IV on edge and pushed, just a little at first to develop some feel and feedback. Wow was this thing stiff! I pushed a little harder, then a little harder, finally I just cranked into it with every thing I had and that’s when the board came alive. At first I was truly disappointed about the board being much too stiff for my weight. Frank and I are friends, so he knows how I ride. He built the board while thinking of me. “Why am I having such a hard time making it work?” I was turned off after just one run. How could this be? I love the III. I can ride however I want on the III. Forwards, backwards, left, right and even up and down with input ranging from not much to massive amounts. The III loves it and I just couldn’t figure out why was the IV being such a bitch? I spent the rest of the morning wishing I weighed 40 pounds more and riding as hard as I could on the IV and although I was getting tired fast from working my ass off I began to become more comfortable on the IV. By the end of the day, the board felt much friendlier but I had worked so hard to ride it I just wasn’t sure if it was the correct flex for me. After getting my butt kicked hard early in the AM I wasn’t even sure if it was something I would like to ride all day due to all the energy it would take. Plus, in this day and age of easy to bend metal boards, I felt the IV may have too much “old school” wood board feel like the days when we needed ski boots and metal bindings just to bend gear.

When Frank and I sat down to discuss the board I pulled no punches. “Dude, I love the shape and size and the specs feel great but I don’t think I weigh enough to bend it.” Frank just smiled and responded “You are going to have to break it in a bit.” I over build most of my boards. The first week, or five sessions or so, the board IS a bit much. My level of respect for Frank is huge, so I of course took his word for it because he built the damn thing. But as a test pilot, I wanted to feel it out for the masses so that’s what I did. Over a night of drinking (which I should have charged

to the Hardbooter account because it was research, right?), I asked almost everyone I had ever seen ride a Virus how long it took to “break in” their boards. The amount of time varied from one rider to the next, but they all said their board was too stiff at first, which confirms Frank’s response. I need to log more days on the IV to give it a fair shake down, or even better I’ll hand it over to some one else to ride for a week then try it again, which is what I did. You know, Burton has established a technique with all their high end boards; it’s called “infinite ride.” What they do is over build each board. Then, they place it in a robot that bends the board over and over again thousands of times to break it down so it can’t break down anymore for the rider. Does this sound familiar?

Virus Scalpell Titanal

Virus Scalpell Titanal

The snow started to soften up a bit so the Scalpel became the tool of choice. Now this is Virus’s Euro Carve wide board and we had the 180cm version to play with. The ride of this board is geared to a rider who likes to make the low, laid out style of turn. Frank can rail euro carves all over the hill, so you can feel the “soul” he put in the board. I made all the turn shapes I could think of and due to the metal construction, the board has great torsion from edge to edge for a board of this width. What does this mean to the rider? Versatility! With Bomber bindings and a stiffer boot like the 700, the board was very predictable under foot. It has a small turn radius when needed, almost like a big SL board, but it also lets you drag out the turn if you choose to do so. Of course, as all metal binding riders know, the direct input in the board gives a very direct feel which hinders some laid out turns. The metal in this board allows you the option to absorb the bounce and release that some time occurs while carving at high angles in a more responsive set up. The side cut is great for making nice controlled laid out turns on moderate to steep pitches while still allowing plenty of options to bleed speed. The slower speeds are much more rewarding with the metal binding allowing a lot of feedback not normally found in a board of this width, especially a metal construction board. Now in the softer F2 binding, I really felt loose and had the ability to move around a bunch more. This board felt a lot more relaxed under my feet and with the TD2′s I had to find “my sweet spot” on the inserts, which was more on the tail than centered on the insert pack. In the F2′s, I rode the inserts centered as well as set all the way back and a couple of positions in-between. The board works much differently based on where you set it up; it has a lot of personality. When you mount the board centered on the inserts, it’s a euro carving machine. It dives into the turn and settles down very nicely as the edge angle increases, something several other boards in this width don’t do well. Again, I would attribute this to the metal construction. The nice thing about this board is when you start to mix up the styles and ride it more aggressively at higher speeds it still performs very well. I threw it around backwards; it railed turns. I tried SL style turns; it railed turns. I released the edge and reengaged it; guess what, it rail turns. Bottom line is: this board rips. If you are looking for a high end wide carver that does it all, then this board clearly excels.

Virus Scalpell Logo

Virus Scalpell Logo

Of all the wider style alpine boards I have ridden, I felt this may be the most diversified. This euro carver doesn’t force you to only make laid out turns, it lets you play all day however you choose to, something I feel several other board in the euro carve style have lacked. I highly recommend that you find your way onto a Schalpel if you are in the market for a wide all mountain style alpine board. With several sizes to choose from there is a Scalpel for everyone, even you. As most readers know, I have a soft spot for a race shape and after throttling back a bit on the Scalpel I was ready to bring the Phantom back up to speed. Now that it had enough sessions on it to “break in,” I was ready to rail the piss out of it. When it comes to race sticks there is only one way to ride them; wide open. Now after a few sessions the IV was flexing perfect under my feet. If you are looking for a board to cruise around and make easy relaxed turns on, then the IV is not for you. However, if you are an upper level rider looking to put 80% to100% of your effort into each turn and be rewarded by the smooth responsive ride you can only get from maybe three board manufacturers in the world, then the Virus is your stick. It is elite, providing any rider who makes the correct inputs with all the edge hold, dampening, and feel of a team race stock board ready to do battle with the Kesslers, SG, or Prior PGS stick in the next gate. If your riding is top notch, you can make any board work for you, but there are only a few boards that hold up under full power. The IV even allows you to relax a bit without getting sketchy. It even rails turns switch. Don’t get me wrong, it is a race board and may not be the tool of choice for the weekend warrior looking to “relax and ride with the family.” If you want the best PGS race shape offered from Virus, this is it. When you are ready to invest in a high end uberboard, then the Virus is a must buy for the high end alpine rider. For me it is a must have; after one ride it will be for you also!!!! With Virus, there are some ride characteristics not found in the other manufacturer’s boards. While several boards destroy PGS courses, the Virus may be the very first “hybrid” board offered to the public. Many recreational riders mount up full metal race sticks for trenching their local cord. Several riders have noticed there is a lack of the pop they love from the wood sticks. Also, durability has become an issue for some hard chargers. After hearing this feedback from several of their board testers, Virus has stepped it up with a full race shape that still has the pop and acceleration missing from the Kessler. The Viruses maintain the longevity we have come to expect from a non metal board with the unmatched construction and quality only provided to Virus clients. This includes the fastest base ever placed on a Virus and the legendary rubber tail. If you’re ready to make the investment into metal but have been skeptical about the durability issues with some of the first generation metal boards then your worries are over. The IV may be the ultimate race shape board for the “race carver” who doesnt spend every day training to compete but still wants to look behind them for the friends they are riding with. Get infected with a Virus! Hardbooter.com knows there is no cure. You should too!!

–Billy

May 18th, 2008

http://hardbooter.net/blog/

Condividi !!
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: seo service | Thanks to seo company, web designers and internet marketing company